Comments on: a la caza del axión

By: Irra

Irra — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:18:39 +0000

al menos se ha molestado en responder :P

By: Taliesin

Taliesin — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:43:29 +0000

bueno, la gente lo mínimo que hace es mirar los trackbacks…

By: Irra

Irra — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:27:31 +0000

Joer, va a resultar que tenemos nuestro sitio en el ciberespacio y todo…

By: Illaq

Illaq — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:00:46 +0000

John, first of all, thank you very much for your remarks. I don’t sure that my English is good enough to explain my position in the post… You are right. I’ve red the Jain and Singh’s article and I know that it’s quite accurate: it’s a kind of little summary of the contents of the article. My text is wrong because, by mistake, I’ve supressed the mention of the second article, a kind of press note in Physorg. I correct the mistake immediately.

By: John Baez

John Baez — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:04:50 +0000

Lo siento, no hablo espanol…

I didn’t say that the title of Jain and Singh’s article was inaccurate. Their title, “Search for new light particles decaying into electron pairs of mass below 100 MeV/c^2″, is quite accurate. It’s the title of this article which is inaccurate: “Long the fixation of physicists worldwide, a tiny particle is found”.

By: Irra

Irra — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:25:59 +0000

Un poco más y me voy a la cama despues de este post…

IRRA’S STACK OVERFLOW
IRRA’S STACK OVERFLOW
IRRA’S STACK OVERFLOW
IRRA’S STACK OVERFLOW
IRRA’S STACK OVERFLOW